« Kyoto to Nara | Home | Note on Uneme Jinja »

Tuesday in Nara

Wed 7 Sep 2011 by mskala Tags used:

September 6 was the first day of MOL 12 - the workshop that is my excuse for coming to Japan in the first place. I'm not going to go into much detail on the conference itself, at least not right here; I did record the audio from my talk but I'm not even sure if I'll post it. I think it went okay, but I'm not sure I was really at the top of my game; some of my other conference talks have been better.

September 6 photo gallery.

I got up pretty early and risked the hotel breakfast buffet, which turned out to be quite good. On some future day I'll take some photos of that; on Tuesday I concentrated on the park and city.

Roughly in the order of the photos: whereas hotels in the West often have coffee makers in the rooms, the equivalent amenity in a Japanese hotel is an induction heater for hot water, and a couple packets of green tea (お抹茶, o-matcha) powder. There are a couple of shots of the integrated bathroom unit. The inside of the hotel room door has a sign warning you that it's not on a spring and won't close by itself, so you must close it by hand - if you are too stupid to notice that the door is standing open, but still intelligent enough to read the sign. (In fact, the sign is a lie: the door does close by itself.)

From the hotel to the conference venue is just a short walk through the grounds of the Kofuku Ji (a Buddhist temple), 10 minutes or so if you don't stop along the way. I spent three hours making the trip, wandering all over the park and other parts of the city, and as a result I was so tired by the time I arrived at the conference, I had no energy for socializing and just sat and waited for the talks to start. Eventually the deputy conference organizer came over to make sure I was okay.

I think most of my commentary on the temple photos will wait until I get on a better Net connection and can spend some time looking things up to make sure I know which picture is which - I didn't make notes, my memory is only partial, and I wasn't always sure what I was looking at even at the time. There'll be a guided tour later which may clear some of it up. So I may go back and post explanations as comments in the gallery; go look for those if you're interested.

The park is full of deer, who are a Big Deal in Nara. They seemed less agressive than I've been warned, but nonetheless, there were plenty of signs up warning that the deer may bite you and you may not bite them back. (It's the same deal as with strippers.) To be precise, the deer will "Bite," "Kick," "Butt," and "Knock down" you. You can get cookies to feed them; I haven't tried that yet.

Many buildings at Kofuku Ji are designated national treasures. Probably the most famous one is the five-story pagoda, the second-highest pagoda in Japan. One thing I've noticed about these religious buildings - the Buddhist ones especially - is how big they feel. From a distance or on a map they may not seem unusual, but up close, it always feels like being in the presence of a mountain or something. I don't know if that's an energy thing or just clever architecture. (If, of course, there is a meaningful difference between those two explanations.)

It's also noteworthy that at least at this temple, even though it's theoretically a Buddhist facility, it's very Shinto in flavour. At a Shinto shrine you wash your hands, ring a bell, throw a coin, pray, and maybe buy a wooden plaque, write your prayer on that, and hang it on the rack. What I saw people doing at some of the Buddhist buildings on the Kofuku Ji grounds was: wash your hands, ring a gong, throw a coin, pray, and maybe buy a wooden stick, write your prayer on it, and leave it in the box to be burned. Of course there's also the whole thing of having actual Shinto shrines on the Buddhist temple grounds and vice versa - sometimes sharing staff between the two - which is typical at many sites in Japan. You know, just like how the average cathedral in the West has a couple of mosques in the basement.

See photos of 「えんむすび采女神社」 - which was closed when I took the photos, and I'm not sure how to pronounce some of those kanji (which I'd need in order to romanize the name; it's "Enmusubi (something) Jinja") - but I guess I can look that up later. The characters in the name mean "marriage-dice-woman-shrine." Note the heart shape on the sign. There are also signs up all over town advertising what seems to be the festival of that shrine, but it unfortunately seems to start on the 12th, the day after I will leave town.

Nara has several covered shopping streets full of tourist traps. These are aimed at domestic tourists (from elsewhere in Japan) much more than at people from further away, like me.

I've a photo of a sign explaining that "Some types of DARUMA doll return to the upright Position after being tilted to one side like weebles." Weebles? I was amazed that Weebl and Bob were known even here; but it turns out that actually, a "Weeble" is a kind of toy from the USA that was popular in the 1970s, from which Weebl probably got his name. I had not known that.

After wandering around for three hours, I went to the conference for the rest of the day. There were only three talks other than the invited ones, and mine was one of them. (A fourth had been scheduled but the speaker was unable to attend because of visa troubles.) Talks at this conference are being scheduled into 45-minute slots instead of the more usual 30-minute conference slots, so I had to write my talk a little longer than I otherwise would.

I was quite interested in an invited talk by a philosopher named Kit Fine about "truth-maker semantics," which discussed mathematical descriptions of just what sentences really mean. The technical details are very complicated, but I was pleased that I understood the talk better than I expected to. Some of it may be applicable to my own work. As a very simple example of the kinds of issues involved, consider the sentences "John ate an apple." and "John ate at least one apple." Under some simple theories of meaning, those two sentences have exactly the same meaning: one is true if and only if the other is true. But consider saying "John ate an apple and it was delicious." or "John ate at least one apple and it was delicious." One of those sounds really weird; why? The answer is that the two sentences we started with do not really mean the same thing; there's more to what a sentence means than just whether it might or might not be true. We need a more subtle way of expressing what "meaning" is.

At the end we had the conference banquet, which was lots of local specialties at a fancy traditional restaurant, but I only took one photo there, of a plate of nine kinds of fermented bean and seed products. Some of those were more palatable than others, but the overall banquet experience was very good. One dish I particularly liked was a thin slice of beef cooked at the table in a wooden steamer box - the waitress comes around and sets fire to a fuel pellet under it and then some minutes later you open the box and there's your onion-steamed beef slice. They also served good sake, a nice contrast to the bad sake I had not long ago in Canada.

I made it back to the hotel and into bed by about 10:30pm. I'm starting to get back onto a reasonable sleep/wake cycle.

Share on: Facebook Facebook Twitter Twitter Reddit Reddit LinkedIn LinkedIn


(optional field)
(optional field)
Answer "bonobo" here to fight spam. ここに「bonobo」を答えてください。SPAMを退治しましょう!
I reserve the right to delete or edit comments in any way and for any reason. New comments are held for a period of time before being shown to other users.